Difference between revisions of "User talk:GW Simulations"

From OrbiterWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (R/V Vandalism)
m (Reverted edits by 74.208.11.169 (Talk); changed back to last version by Urwumpe)
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Please feel free to leave comments here.== --[[User:GW Simulations|GW_Simulations]] 17:34, 26 March 2006 (MSD)
+
'''Please feel free to leave comments here''' --[[User:GW Simulations|GW_Simulations]] 17:34, 26 March 2006 (MSD)
  
 
== Server Problem? ==
 
== Server Problem? ==
 
Whenever I go onto any page other that this one, I get a "new messages" message, but when I come here, there are no new messages. Can anyone help? --[[User:GW Simulations|GW_Simulations]] 22:11, 28 March 2006 (MSD)
 
Whenever I go onto any page other that this one, I get a "new messages" message, but when I come here, there are no new messages. Can anyone help? --[[User:GW Simulations|GW_Simulations]] 22:11, 28 March 2006 (MSD)
 +
**Finally fixed it. Someone had deleted a previous version of the page. I have restored it, and it is now working.
 +
 +
== VAND3 for spammers ==
 +
 +
Don't waste the VAND3 for professional spammers or spambots - they won't care about the one month ban, you can directly permamently ban them, if you like. I think about stopping banning them and instead just update the spam black list for making it harder for them by attacking the rarest resource of them: server domains. [[User:Urwumpe|Urwumpe]] 16:54, 16 July 2006 (MSD)

Latest revision as of 18:13, 11 November 2007

Please feel free to leave comments here --GW_Simulations 17:34, 26 March 2006 (MSD)

Server Problem?[edit]

Whenever I go onto any page other that this one, I get a "new messages" message, but when I come here, there are no new messages. Can anyone help? --GW_Simulations 22:11, 28 March 2006 (MSD)

    • Finally fixed it. Someone had deleted a previous version of the page. I have restored it, and it is now working.

VAND3 for spammers[edit]

Don't waste the VAND3 for professional spammers or spambots - they won't care about the one month ban, you can directly permamently ban them, if you like. I think about stopping banning them and instead just update the spam black list for making it harder for them by attacking the rarest resource of them: server domains. Urwumpe 16:54, 16 July 2006 (MSD)