Difference between revisions of "Talk:Svobodniy"
(→Quality of references: new section) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I think the references of the article are while near the topic not explaining the claimed information of the base properly. one for example us one link away from the article about the base itself. Another is plain Russian illustration without explanation for non-Russian readers. I am posting and editing from a smartphone which makes it hard to fix this all myself. Thereferences and links should be further reading and sources for facts, but like they are now, it is just a unsorted and untitled collection of links. --[[User:Urwumpe|Urwumpe]] ([[User talk:Urwumpe|talk]]) 16:20, 3 January 2013 (UTC) | I think the references of the article are while near the topic not explaining the claimed information of the base properly. one for example us one link away from the article about the base itself. Another is plain Russian illustration without explanation for non-Russian readers. I am posting and editing from a smartphone which makes it hard to fix this all myself. Thereferences and links should be further reading and sources for facts, but like they are now, it is just a unsorted and untitled collection of links. --[[User:Urwumpe|Urwumpe]] ([[User talk:Urwumpe|talk]]) 16:20, 3 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Agree. As you can understand, I collected the most relevant links in terms of raw information for base building. I'm using the wiki as a support for the "default bases tiles + objects" project. That's why I added an orbital photo for example. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Feel free to organize them as you see fit. | ||
Revision as of 17:03, 3 January 2013
Quality of references
I think the references of the article are while near the topic not explaining the claimed information of the base properly. one for example us one link away from the article about the base itself. Another is plain Russian illustration without explanation for non-Russian readers. I am posting and editing from a smartphone which makes it hard to fix this all myself. Thereferences and links should be further reading and sources for facts, but like they are now, it is just a unsorted and untitled collection of links. --Urwumpe (talk) 16:20, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Agree. As you can understand, I collected the most relevant links in terms of raw information for base building. I'm using the wiki as a support for the "default bases tiles + objects" project. That's why I added an orbital photo for example.
Feel free to organize them as you see fit.