Difference between revisions of "Intuitive Atmospheric Entry/precis"

From OrbiterWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:Shuttle Entry 1.jpg|left|100 px|Figure 1. Shuttle flying at AoA of 17deg, at about mach 3. Higher mach numbers require a higher AoA]]'''Intuitive Atmospheric Reentry'''. It is a common complaint on the Orbiter message boards that the aerodynamics on the Space Shuttle model are screwed up. This is usually reported after a person deorbits the vehicle, puts it in the right angle of attack... and then bounces off the atmosphere several times and overshoots the Cape. I know, I've done it myself. Here's how to enter the correct way. '''[[Intuitive Atmospheric Entry|(More...)]]'''
+
[[Image:Shuttle Entry 3.jpg|left|100 px|Figure 1. Shuttle flying at AoA of 17deg, at about mach 3. Higher mach numbers require a higher AoA]]'''Intuitive Atmospheric Reentry'''. It is a common complaint on the Orbiter message boards that the aerodynamics on the Space Shuttle model are screwed up. This is usually reported after a person deorbits the vehicle, puts it in the right angle of attack... and then bounces off the atmosphere several times and overshoots the Cape. I know, I've done it myself. Here's how to enter the correct way. '''[[Intuitive Atmospheric Entry|(More...)]]'''

Revision as of 15:44, 15 December 2006

Figure 1. Shuttle flying at AoA of 17deg, at about mach 3. Higher mach numbers require a higher AoA

Intuitive Atmospheric Reentry. It is a common complaint on the Orbiter message boards that the aerodynamics on the Space Shuttle model are screwed up. This is usually reported after a person deorbits the vehicle, puts it in the right angle of attack... and then bounces off the atmosphere several times and overshoots the Cape. I know, I've done it myself. Here's how to enter the correct way. (More...)